ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1846|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD逻辑19,N哥请进!√

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-18 13:37:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Rumored declines in automobile-industry revenues are exaggerated. It is true that automobile manufactures’ share of the industry’s revenues fell from 65 percent two years ago to 50 percent today, but over the same period suppliers of automobile parts had their share increase from 15 percent to 20 percent and service companies (for example, distributors, dealers, and repairers) had their share increase from 20 percent to 30 percent.

Which one of the following best indicates why the statistics given above provide by themselves no evidence for the conclusion they are intended to support?

(A) The possibility is left open that the statistics for manufactures’ share of revenues come from a different source than the other statistics.
(B) No matter what changes the automobile industry’s overall revenues undergo, the total of all shares of these revenues must be 100 percent.
(C) No explanation is given for why the revenue shares of different sectors of the industry changed.
(D) Manufactures and parts companies depend for their revenue on dealers’ success in selling cars.
(E) Revenues are an important factor but are not the only factor in determining profits.
答案是b
Rumored declines in automobile-industry revenues are exaggerated 是结论
可以认为acde四个选项没有说清楚是不是decline,而b是百分比不变,但total revenues的总金额也没有说明是升是降.
所以我想5个选项都没法证明结论的正确性
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-18 13:47:23 | 只看该作者
题目问的是no evidence for the conclusion ,也就是说“数据不支持结论”即可,并不要求一定证明升降。


Rumored declines in automobile-industry revenues are exaggerated. It is true that automobile manufactures’ share of the industry’s revenues fell from 65 percent two years ago to 50 percent today, but over the same period suppliers of automobile parts had their share increase from 15 percent to 20 percent and service companies (for example, distributors, dealers, and repairers) had their share increase from 20 percent to 30 percent.

Which one of the following best indicates why the statistics given above provide by themselves no evidence for the conclusion they are intended to support?

(A) The possibility is left open that the statistics for manufactures’ share of revenues come from a different source than the other statistics.
(B) No matter what changes the automobile industry’s overall revenues undergo, the total of all shares of these revenues must be 100 percent.
(C) No explanation is given for why the revenue shares of different sectors of the industry changed.
(D) Manufactures and parts companies depend for their revenue on dealers’ success in selling cars.
(E) Revenues are an important factor but are not the only factor in determining profits.
答案是b
Rumored declines in automobile-industry revenues are exaggerated 是结论
可以认为acde四个选项没有说清楚是不是decline,而b是百分比不变,但total revenues的总金额也没有说明是升是降.
所以我想5个选项都没法证明结论的正确性
-- by 会员 gedn01 (2010/2/18 13:37:19)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-23 12:26:53 | 只看该作者
看来是对问题的阅读速度太快导致不明了问题目的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 10:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部