ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1342|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

菜鸟求助~~~~~~~~~求好心人指点

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-17 20:37:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In corporate purchasing,

competitive scrutiny is typically
limited to suppliers of items that are
Linedirectly related to end products.
(5)With “indirect” purchases (such as
computers, advertising, and legal
services), which are not directly
related to production, corporations
often favor “supplier partnerships”
(10)(arrangements in which the
purchaser forgoes the right to
pursue alternative suppliers), which
can inappropriately shelter suppliers
from rigorous competitive scrutiny
(15)that might afford the purchaser
economic leverage.There are two
independent variables—availability
of alternatives and ease of changing
suppliers—that companies should
(20)use to evaluate the feasibility of
subjecting suppliers of indirect
purchases to competitive scrutiny.
This can create four possible
situations.
(25)In Type 1 situations, there are
many alternatives and change is
relatively easy.Open pursuit of
alternatives—by frequent com-
petitive bidding, if possible—will
(30)likely yield the best results.In
Type 2 situations, where there
are many alternatives but change
is difficult—as for providers of
employee health-care benefits—it
(35)is important to continuously test
the market and use the results to
secure concessions from existing
suppliers.Alternatives provide a
credible threat to suppliers, even if
(40)the ability to switch is constrained.
In Type 3 situations, there ate few
alternatives, but the ability to switch
without difficulty creates a threat that
companies can use to negotiate
(45)concessions from existing suppliers.
In Type 4 situations, where there
are few alternatives and change
is difficult, partnerships may be
unavoidable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:
Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?


    The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.
    The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.
    The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.
    The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.
    The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.
不懂
第一段说的是种情况吧
In corporate purchasing,

competitive scrutiny is typically
limited to suppliers of items that are
Linedirectly related to end products.
哪来的strategy啊

还有,第二段衍生了四种小情况分类,怎么是application啊
想不通






收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-17 20:38:31 | 只看该作者
我知道别的不对,可我看着C也没觉得对 啊

诶。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。该怎么办啊。。。。。。。。。。。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-18 19:53:34 | 只看该作者
UPUP
地板
发表于 2010-2-18 20:06:28 | 只看该作者
呵呵,楼主对application歧义?我有点不知道楼主想让我解释啥~感觉很简单啊~~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-19 09:42:52 | 只看该作者

诶。。。。我一点都不觉得简单。。。。差距啊。。。。。。
想问一下,那么strategy是指什么呢?在哪出现的呢?
6#
发表于 2010-2-19 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
here are two independent variables—availability of alternatives and ease of changing suppliers—that companies should use to evaluate the feasibility of subjecting suppliers of indirect
有两个独立变量- 替代品可用性和更换供应商的便利性- 可让公司用来评估是否要间接采购供应商接受竞争力审查。
然后就是我们的四种情况的讨论
2个变量,4个情况用来评估是否要间接采购供应商接受竞争力审查 ~

目的~在每个情况下咋办都交代了~
你在看c就是啊~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-19 19:23:22 | 只看该作者
再次感谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-15 14:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部