ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2038|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【GWD几道题~大家来帮帮忙吧~】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-8 21:40:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD3-Q32:
Newspaper editorial:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B.Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C.The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D.Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E.The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
没有太看明白题目的意思?更加没有看懂它的推理了,希望有朋友能解释一下,谢谢咯~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-8 21:58:58 | 只看该作者
D~~
板凳
发表于 2010-2-8 23:04:41 | 只看该作者
D是首先可以排除的吧,根本没说到high school level courses

应该是C,取反后原文结论被推翻
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-10 16:09:21 | 只看该作者
D是首先可以排除的吧,根本没说到high school level courses

应该是C,取反后原文结论被推翻
-- by 会员 azurezenith (2010/2/8 23:04:41)


能不能分析一下这个题目的逻辑,不好意思,我没有太看明白它的意思??还有选项。。。。。谢谢
5#
发表于 2010-2-10 16:29:00 | 只看该作者
政府要减少犯罪率. 于是决定要让监狱的生活更加艰苦, 所以就不让某些想在监狱里读大学课程的人读了. 而这些在监狱里读了大学课程的人被释放后再犯罪的概率比一般犯人低. 所以政府的措施不当.

1. 削弱. 说读不读与犯罪率无关.
2. 无关. 冒了个普通人...
3. 正确. 把读大学课程与犯罪率联系起来.
4. 无关. 高中都出来了.
5. 无关. 太不靠扑了
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-10 21:57:05 | 只看该作者
政府要减少犯罪率. 于是决定要让监狱的生活更加艰苦, 所以就不让某些想在监狱里读大学课程的人读了. 而这些在监狱里读了大学课程的人被释放后再犯罪的概率比一般犯人低. 所以政府的措施不当.

1. 削弱. 说读不读与犯罪率无关.
2. 无关. 冒了个普通人...
3. 正确. 把读大学课程与犯罪率联系起来.
4. 无关. 高中都出来了.
5. 无关. 太不靠扑了
-- by 会员 clarry (2010/2/10 16:29:00)



解释看懂了,非常感谢!~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-8 15:41:50 | 只看该作者
http://bbs..org/dispbbs.asp?boardid=40&Id=202214

横向比较背景相同

政府的目的是为了让监狱条件恶化(不让犯人上学了),这样能减少犯罪率,但是最后的结果却是,上过这样课程的人出来不容易犯罪了。

题目就是拿上过这样课和没上过这样课的两种犯人来比较他们谁更容易犯罪来削弱政府的action.比较的前提假设是,上没上过课的犯人在没上课之前容不容易犯罪都是一样的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 13:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部