ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1899|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助Lsat-5-5-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-28 06:05:00 | 只看该作者

求助Lsat-5-5-5

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.



Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?



(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.



(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.



(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.



(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.

(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.



答案为什么是C呢?我觉得是B 阿,C象是支持,而不是削弱阿?


沙发
发表于 2004-3-28 07:57:00 | 只看该作者
1.文中的逻辑在最后一句话:IF...THEN.     C选项否定IF


2.关键在C选项的理解:没有大公司赞助商的支持,歌剧公司只够钱制作最有名歌剧.其它歌剧不够钱制作.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-28 22:53:00 | 只看该作者
i see. thank you every much.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 02:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部