ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2188|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

开始阅读学习帖----今天我的第一问:作者态度

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-13 14:37:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
其实这是一个很白痴的问题啦。但是还是想请各位RCNN,予以指点,小女子拜谢先~

这是OG12-RC-1
[bgcolor=#ffffff]Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations.Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.[/bgcolor]
[bgcolor=#ffffff][/bgcolor]
[bgcolor=#ffffff]文章里花花绿绿的标记大家可以忽略啊~!呵呵,实在去不掉了。但看我做了红色加粗字体处理的那句,应该这句是作者的态度吧?[/bgcolor]
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-13 14:54:58 | 只看该作者
昨天刚做完这一篇,开门红。
自己认为这句话是作者的观点,但出现在全文最后的这种全文框架又让我不是很自信。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-13 15:50:14 | 只看该作者
昨天刚做完这一篇,开门红。
自己认为这句话是作者的观点,但出现在全文最后的这种全文框架又让我不是很自信。
-- by 会员 w252330908 (2010/1/13 14:54:58)



这是我第三遍了……开始仔细的再过文章了。其实一开始就比较疑惑这个句子,有点上下不沾的感觉。今天再看文章,就觉得像作者的观点,所以拿出来献丑,问问NN
地板
发表于 2010-1-18 10:27:49 | 只看该作者
为啥我觉得是

Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.

这句呢?

最后那句难道不是说影响的吗?是文章的引深的地方吧,为什么就能是TS呢?

PS:MM你觉得这篇文章的类型是什么?我觉得是现象解释题。
5#
发表于 2010-1-20 12:49:11 | 只看该作者
LZ用红色加粗字体处理的那句,我觉得这不是作者的态度。我觉得LS说的那一句是作者态度。就是对文中描述的现象 (simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations ) 有concern。
6#
发表于 2010-1-20 14:44:14 | 只看该作者
这篇文章我就是读到红体字部分开始晕,没搞懂最后这句话到底想告诉读者什么~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-8 12:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部