划线部分是我自己的想法 大家可以跳过不看 看我最后的问题就行 114 . Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout thecountry and have noticed that inthose built before1930 the quality of the original carpentry work isgenerally superior to that in hotels built afterward.Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930typically worked with more skill, care, and effort thancarpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?
Situation:
Building before 1930 are good, so they work with more care and effort.
Find another reason is a good way. The author makes a assumption that the more care and efforts are the only way to build a better house.
unreasonable assumptions
(A)The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
If it is good, it is good for both past and now
(B)Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
irrelevant (C)The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
Different we can assume it as better, that make sense. different maybe means "better"
and if it does, there is another reason contribute to the difference in quality other than the effort. --- weaken the argument (D)The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
So --- the left buildings are all with high quality, so it is a unrepresentative sample, this comparison is not fair --- weaken the argument (E)The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-7-2 03:19:59
收藏
收藏
楼主