ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2146|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道逻辑,蒙了.....请教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-9 11:26:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet’s mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of which Halley’s comet is composed reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than had been previously thought.

The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one of the following?

(A) Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of which Halley’s comet is composed.

(B) Previous estimates of the mass of Halley’s comet which were base on its brightness were too low.

(C) The total amount of light reflected from Halley’s comet is less than scientists had previously thought.

B和C有什么区别么?说的都是一回事啊???正确答案是B.....C错哪了??
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-9 11:53:18 | 只看该作者
因果混乱,科学家是根据反光来判断质量的,所以只可能判断错质量。反光是看到的,而不是根据质量来估计的,怎么可能少估计呢?这个是事后诸葛亮。
板凳
发表于 2010-1-9 11:59:58 | 只看该作者
原文推选项
科学家是通过light per unit of mass的方法来estimate coments的重量的。但是哈雷彗星的材料和其他彗星的材料不一样,这种材料的light per unit of mass比一般彗星材料小60倍。所以以前科学家根据light per unit of mass的方法来estimate哈雷彗星的重量就too low了。选B
C,文中没有说科学家previously thought哈雷彗星的光亮度。文中科学家previously thought的是light per unit mass。认为哈雷彗星和其他彗星一样的light per unit mass.
希望我说清楚了,汗~!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-9 13:23:34 | 只看该作者
多谢两位,明白了,是根据光度推得质量,所以应该是质量错不是光错.....呵呵,大意了...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-13 00:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部