大全－1－2

deng2y · 发表于 2009-12-21 05:23:32

contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provision of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.

The author's method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to
(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim
(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs
(C) point out that the opponents' reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion
(D) show that the opponents' reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion
(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget

此题我选的是C,正确答案为B

tangyp · 发表于 2009-12-21 09:42:52

这题答案应该是B
New Deal programs有些缺点（unconstitutional），但是却pulled this country out of great economic troubles
the new deficit-reduction law也有些缺点（ndiscriminate cuts in the federal budget），这是可以被justified

deng2y · 发表于 2009-12-22 02:02:41

弄明白了～谢谢！

大全－1－2

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()