ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2097|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-3-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-19 16:40:00 | 只看该作者

大全-3-20

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.

(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.E

(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee

看了前人的解释,我发现这道题在问什么我依然不懂?

即Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?  到底是什么意思?  if 后面跟的是 comment 的内容吗?

沙发
发表于 2009-12-12 11:39:59 | 只看该作者
原文中说:如果超过一个候选人被提名的话,准候选人知道各自都是啥宁=》同意被提名=》被提名
题目中说:评价下如果顺序变成,同意被提名=》准候选人知道各自都是啥宁的逻辑
这两个逻辑是相矛盾的,最后的结果就是如果有多个候选人,就选不出来
板凳
发表于 2009-12-12 12:26:33 | 只看该作者
题和选项都读懂了 但是没搞懂逻辑 能不能再解释一下 谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 08:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部