ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1863|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD的一道题,真的是无法理解,请看

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-13 18:07:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
9.X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent.This belief is irrational.After all,being dealt four aces in a hand of poker,a rare event,hardly increases one's chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.

Y:To the contrary,the belief is rational because it results in people's sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.

Y's attempt to counter X's claim is best described by which of the following?

a.It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.

b.It makes apparent X's failure to consider how people vary in their reponses to a serious accident.

c.It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility

d.It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs

e.It challenges X's assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.

此题怎么解?我选了B

陈向东的书上的题有些是来自GRE,LSAT,但愿这种类型的题目不是GMAT曾经有过的类型.不然,惨了.本人逻辑太差了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-13 22:44:28 | 只看该作者
C
"to the contrary..."然后指出自己的分析层面。
个人观点。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 07:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部