|
Recent feminist scholarship con- cerning the United States
in the 1920’s challenges
earlier interpretations that Line assessed the twenties in terms of the (5) unkept “promises” of the women’s suffrage movement. This new scholar- ship disputes the long-held view that because a women’s voting bloc did not materialize after women gained the right (10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to produce long-term political gains for women. These feminist scholars also challenge the old view that pronounced suffrage a failure for not delivering on (15) the promise that the women’s vote would bring about moral, corruption- free governance. Asked whether women’s suffrage was a failure, these scholars cite the words of turn-of-the- (20) century social reformer Jane Addams, “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in general is failing?”学者的观点认为suffrage是失败 In some ways, however, these递进 scholars still present the 1920’s as a (25) period of decline. After suffrage, they argue, the feminist movement lost its cohesiveness, and gender conscious- ness waned. After the mid-1920’s, few successes could be claimed by fem- (30) inist reformers: little could be seen in the way of legislative victories.
衰退的年代 new scholarship的另一观点 During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achiev- ing increased autonomy for women, (35)
broadening the spheres within which they lived their daily lives. Women’s organizations worked to establish opportunities for women: they strove to secure for women the full entitlements (40) of citizenship, including the right to hold office and the right to serve on juries.最终观点
不同意recent的观点 老新观点 逻辑简图： 1P: recent scholarship challenges earlier interpretations unkept “promise” of women suffrage. Disputes, also challenges older view… 2P: in some ways, however, decline…. 3P: during this decade, however, intense activism…. Women’ organization worked to establish opportunities for women… 我想问整个文章的基调： 蓝色的部分是大牛的标注 大牛说“学者的观点认为suffrage是失败“，我怎么觉得应该反过来呢？ 第一段： long-held view
that because a women’s voting bloc did not materialize after women gained the right (10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to produce long-term political gains for women. 划线的部分应该是老观点啊，而老观点认为suffrage失败，那么学者的观点跟老观点相反，就应该支持suffrage是成功的 再来看后面一句： These feminist scholars also challenge the old view
that pronounced suffrage a failure for not delivering on (15) the promise that the women’s vote would bring about moral, corruption- free governance. 划线部分仍然应该是老观点 但是矛盾来了，第三局： Asked whether women’s suffrage was a failure, these scholars cite the words of turn-of-the- century social reformer Jane Addams, “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in general is failing?” 这句话到底是什么意思，尤其是ＪＡ的？？？请教大家 再来看第二段首句：
In some ways, however, these scholars still present the 1920’s as a period of decline. however 明显是与上一段的意思的让步，而这里是说学者认为２０年代有个下降，那么，表示第一段的内容是学者认为他们是支持suffrage的， 而第二段部分说明了在法律角度有个下降 最后一段： During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achiev- ing increased autonomy for women, (35)
broadening the spheres within which they lived their daily lives. Women’s organizations worked to establish opportunities for women: they strove to secure for women the full entitlements (40) of citizenship, including the right to hold office and the right to serve on juries。 我觉得这段是作者自己的观点，是部分解释了为什么２０年代suffrage有个下降，因为 feminist 专注于别的方面了，即妇女的自治权 本来还想问题目的，昨天作错了２／３，但现在自己写完这个帖子后，发现题目全懂了，呵呵 所以这个帖子变成了仅仅，是想质疑一下大牛第一第二段的解释是不是有点问题， 概括以下：我觉得传统观点认为ｓｕｆｆｒａｇｅ是失败的，学者的观点是认为ｓｕｆｆｒａｇｅ是成功的，只是在２０年代有点小退步，而第三段是作者的观点，认为并不是退步，只是在其他方面有了进步。 花了我半个多小时写的帖子，可一定要有人捧场阿  | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-11-11 15:08:00
