ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1996|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 13 15

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-17 00:00:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year.  But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?


The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value.
When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.

问题:
1、But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit,这句话本身读的就很晕,有哪位同学能给讲一讲这句话的语法?
2、我选的是A,首先是因为原文读的很晕,所以选了一个驳斥原文中提到的deficit说法的,就是说压根政府就没打算降低赤字来驳斥观点。正确答案是D,我就没有搞懂为什么是D。哪位同学能帮我吧这几个选项分析一下,谢谢啦!祝各位上7!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-12-17 10:28:36 | 只看该作者
But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit,
=it had not been for the government's huge budget deficit that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar
板凳
发表于 2013-12-17 16:51:44 | 只看该作者
这里是个虚拟语气的假设,简单点说就是 如果没有国家巨大的预算赤字,这个prediction不会有这么负面的影响力
也就是说: budget deficit + prediction->dollar value decline
选项只要证明,在不受budget deficit 影响的情况下,就可以影响dollar value就行。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-17 20:22:17 | 只看该作者
感谢楼上二位同学的讲解,这道题主要是被那个奇怪的倒装句子弄晕了。现在明白点儿了,非常感谢~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 00:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部