ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3983|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

2 XDF练习题问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-18 00:59:00 | 只看该作者

2 XDF练习题问题

In the country of Laurelia,legal restrictions on the sale of lock-picking
equipment were relaxed ten years ago,and since then Laurelia's burglary rate
has risen dramatically.Hence,since legally purchased lock-picking equipment
was used in most burglaries,reintroducing strict limits on the sale of this
equipment would help to reduce Laurelia's burglary rate.
   
Which of the following,if true,gives the strongest support to the argument?

C) The reintroduction of strict limits on the sale of lock-picking equipment
in Laurelia would not prevent legitimate use of this equipment by police and
other public safety officials.
D) Most lock-picking equipment used in Laurelia is fragile and usually breaks
irreparably within a few years of purchase.

Answer is D. understand. But I think C is also a support. right?

================
In a recent film set in seventeenth century Europe,the hero is seen doing the
crawl,a swimming stroke not known in Europe before the 1920s. However,since
moviegoers obviously are not experts in the history of swimming strokes,for most
of the film audiences,this blunder clearly can not have interfered with whatever
sense of historical authenticity the film otherwise achieved.
   
Which of the following,if true,most seriously weakens the argument given?
a)The film was widely praised for being historically plausible,even though it
portrayed many events that were not historically attested.
b)The scene that shows the film's hero doing the crawl is a rescue scene pivotal
to the film's action,and parts of it are even shown a second time,in a flashback
C)Makers of historical films,even of those set as recently as the nineteenth
century,routinely strike compromises between historical authenticity and the
need to keep their material accessible to a modern audience,as in the actors's
speech patterns.
d)The crawl that European swimmers used in the 1920's was much less efficient
and more awkward-looking than the crawl that is currently taught.
E)A slightly earlier film featuring an eighteenth century sea battle in Europe
was ridiculed in numerous popular reviews for the historical lapse of showing a
sailor doing the crawl in swimming to safety

Answer is E. Why? why not B?

Thanks!
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-19 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
NN帮忙看一看吧.谢谢
板凳
发表于 2003-9-19 13:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sbbi在2003-9-18 0:59:00的发言:
In the country of Laurelia,legal restrictions on the sale of lock-picking
equipment were relaxed ten years ago,and since then Laurelia's burglary rate
has risen dramatically.Hence,since legally purchased lock-picking equipment
was used in most burglaries,reintroducing strict limits on the sale of this
equipment would help to reduce Laurelia's burglary rate.
   
Which of the following,if true,gives the strongest support to the argument?

C) The reintroduction of strict limits on the sale of lock-picking equipment
in Laurelia would not prevent legitimate use of this equipment by police and
other public safety officials.
D) Most lock-picking equipment used in Laurelia is fragile and usually breaks
irreparably within a few years of purchase.

Answer is D. understand. But I think C is also a support. right?



C support too, but D is much better than c.
地板
发表于 2003-9-19 13:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sbbi在2003-9-18 0:59:00的发言:
In a recent film set in seventeenth century Europe,the hero is seen doing the
crawl,a swimming stroke not known in Europe before the 1920s. However,since
moviegoers obviously are not experts in the history of swimming strokes,for most
of the film audiences,this blunder clearly can not have interfered with whatever
sense of historical authenticity the film otherwise achieved.
   
Which of the following,if true,most seriously weakens the argument given?
a)The film was widely praised for being historically plausible,even though it
portrayed many events that were not historically attested.
b)The scene that shows the film's hero doing the crawl is a rescue scene pivotal
to the film's action,and parts of it are even shown a second time,in a flashback
C)Makers of historical films,even of those set as recently as the nineteenth
century,routinely strike compromises between historical authenticity and the
need to keep their material accessible to a modern audience,as in the actors's
speech patterns.
d)The crawl that European swimmers used in the 1920's was much less efficient
and more awkward-looking than the crawl that is currently taught.
E)A slightly earlier film featuring an eighteenth century sea battle in Europe
was ridiculed in numerous popular reviews for the historical lapse of showing a
sailor doing the crawl in swimming to safety

Answer is E. Why? why not B?

Thanks!


这题的假设是绝大多数观众不了解历史,从而这个错误不会影响影片的真实性。

E:谁说绝大多数观众不了解历史,不久前就有折磨一部片子翻了同样的错误,结果was ridiculed in numerous popular reviews 。

B:强调该镜头出现的时间短,虽然也削弱,但不如E
5#
发表于 2010-9-28 17:00:10 | 只看该作者
我也有一样的疑惑
6#
发表于 2010-9-28 17:02:26 | 只看该作者
d是否定前提,前提是观众不是expert
7#
发表于 2010-9-28 20:41:52 | 只看该作者
挖,看完帖子内容才看到发帖时间,感觉穿越了.
马克一下吧.
第一题,D是直接否定了隐含假设,如果开锁工具质量很好的话,那即使限制购买,以前那些已经卖出的还是会继续被用来作案.如果很容易坏,n年后,市场上作案工具就会减少

第二题,例子很有说服力,有个类似情况就已经遭到批判,观众不是傻子...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-27 07:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部