Prep逻辑一道求助 NN

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable

B. Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular mediction they have seen advertised

C. Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians

D. Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians

E. Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired

答案是E，我选了C，不明白：（ 求助各位高手，bow~~

up

在H为处方药做广告是违法的，除非广告对象是医生，通过邮件或者医药期刊。一个容许对于一般的处方药做广告的法律被提议通过。反对者认为大宗缺乏专业的知识来分辨这些广告，会要求他们的医师为他们提供不适用的药品。但是因为最终只有医师可以判断是否提供这些药品，所以不合适的药品提供并不会变得很普遍。

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. 对处方药做广告或许可以告诉病患对于以前他们认为不能治愈的疾病现在有有效治疗的方法

B. 是否病患会直接向他们的医师要他们在广告上看到的某种特定的药品

C. 是否被提议的法令要求处方药广告直接面向大众提供和它们面向医师时相同的讯息

D. 是否处方药广告在现阶段是展示新药的重要手段

E.是否医师会在病患不需要的情况下向病患提供病患自己选择的处方药选择让步

E如果成立的话，那么不合适的药品提供并会变得很普遍了

个人观点，欢迎讨论！