ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4733|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-17-30

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-15 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-17-30

Q30:


In a study conducted in Pennsylvania, servers in various restaurants wrote “Thank you” on randomly selected bills before presenting the bills to their customers.  Tips on these bills were an average of three percentage points higher than tips on bills without the message.  Therefore, if servers in Pennsylvania regularly wrote “Thank you” on restaurant bills, their average income from tips would be significantly higher than it otherwise would have been.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?




  • The “Thank you” messages would have the same impact on regular patrons of a restaurant as they would on occasional patrons of the same restaurant.

  • Regularly seeing “Thank you” written on their bills would not lead restaurant patrons to revert to their earlier tipping habits.

  • The written “Thank you” reminds restaurant patrons that tips constitute a significant part of the income of many food servers.

  • The rate at which people tip food servers in Pennsylvania does not vary with how expensive a restaurant is.

  • Virtually all patrons of the Pennsylvania restaurants in the study who were given a bill with “Thank you” written on it left a larger tip than they otherwise would have.

  • B感觉是WEAKEN,去掉NOT是ASSUMPTION吧,求指教

    沙发
    发表于 2005-11-16 00:49:00 | 只看该作者
    哪位帮帮忙啦,先顶上去。
    板凳
    发表于 2005-11-16 11:36:00 | 只看该作者

    B是对的啊.


    题目的前提:有THANK YOU的BILL会增加SERVERS的收入.


    B的意思是如果所有的BILL上都有THANK YOU,而顾客不会因此恢复以前的小费标准(就是不再多给小费),那么SERVERS确实会增加收入.

    地板
    发表于 2005-11-16 19:33:00 | 只看该作者

    明白啦,多谢


    5#
    发表于 2006-10-18 03:31:00 | 只看该作者

    这道题可以看成NOT+削弱就比较容易了。

    按住NOT不看,意思就是顾客还会恢复以前给小费的习惯,也就是少给,削弱了结果,再加上NOT,排除他因,就是假设了。

    6#
    发表于 2006-12-13 11:24:00 | 只看该作者

    那为什么A 不行呢?

    Thank you的Impact 对regular patrons和occasional patrons都一样。那就排除了一种差异性。

    这也可以是结论的Assumption 啊?

    7#
    发表于 2006-12-13 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
    自己顶一下!
    8#
    发表于 2007-4-14 22:51:00 | 只看该作者

    对呀~~我也对A很疑惑~,感觉和B是一个意思吧,都是排除了regularly和occasional存在差异的可能呀

    请nn指教~

    9#
    发表于 2008-7-9 00:12:00 | 只看该作者

    A错在same impact上,如果这个impact是生客给很多tips,而熟客也同样给很多tips,那么就是加强结论的假设

    如果这个impact是生客给少少tips,而熟客也同样给少少,那么就是削弱结论的假设

    前提中并没有说那3%的增加就是生客给的,所以A中暗含假设生客会给多些tips不成立

    10#
    发表于 2008-9-28 17:38:00 | 只看该作者

    GWD 17-30

    E  为什么不对????
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 09:19
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部