ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1895|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教kaplan vebal 的逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-11 01:47:00 | 只看该作者

请教kaplan vebal 的逻辑题

Kaplan verbal 逻辑部分set 3

11.

     Rating record albums to reflect the amount of frank language and violence each one contains, in the way that motion pictures are rated, will not serve to reduce the likelihood that younger children will be exposed to that kind of music. Each of the following, if true, could be logically cited in support of the opinion above EXCEPT:

A.      Most[MSOffice1]  record albums are bought by older  children who generally do not limit their younger siblings' access to their albums.

B.       It would not be feasible to use the rating  system to restrict the range of music that  radio stations may play.

C.       Movie theaters almost never fail to bar children under 18 from admittance to motion pictures of an adult nature.

D.      Record stores could not be relied upon to monitor the age of customers seeking to purchase a particular album.

E.       Younger children who would ordinarily not be interested in music with mature content  might be drawn to it if that content were indicated by a particular rating.

 

 请教哪位给翻译一下?

并且请帮忙分析一下。为什么C正确?

没有看懂答案。

以下是答案

The Conclusion: Ratings won't prevent young children from hearing filthy music.

The Evidence: There is none (except the analogy to theaters);

we have to supply it. It's an "all of the following EXCEPT" question, so we figure out what we have to do and jump to the choices. We want support for the author's claim. If older children will allow younger children access, (A), then the ratings are sidestepped. Likewise, if the radio stations, (B), play the songs. (C) has the theater restrictions working. This is either a weaken or irrelevant (depending on whether the author's analogy to theaters is an illustration or support). For the record, if record stores won't restrict the children from buying, (D), then the ratings are ineffective. And if the ratings attract young listeners, (E), they will actually be counterproductive.

The Conclusion: Ratings won't prevent young children from hearing filthy music.

The Evidence: There is none (except the analogy to theaters);

we have to supply it. It's an "all of the following EXCEPT" question, so we figure out what we have to do and jump to the choices. We want support for the author's claim. If older children will allow younger children access, (A), then the ratings are sidestepped. Likewise, if the radio stations, (B), play the songs. (C) has the theater restrictions working. This is either a weaken or irrelevant (depending on whether the author's analogy to theaters is an illustration or support). For the record, if record stores won't restrict the children from buying, (D), then the ratings are ineffective. And if the ratings attract young listeners, (E), they will actually be counterproductive.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-29 06:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部