ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1417|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教 陈向东 归纳 33,34题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-23 08:27:00 | 只看该作者

请教 陈向东 归纳 33,34题

百思不得其解,做他的书做到要吐血了。

Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and
1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in
teh categorty of low-paying service occupations. This category,
however, will not increase its share of total employment,whereas the
category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.

If the estimates aboove are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A, In 1982 more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.

B.In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.

C.Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982

D.Many
of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in
1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995

E.The
rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than
the overall reate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995

The answer is A.Why?说得是用数学归纳法做,也没有明说, 不知道怎么个玩法。

For
a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly
mistake,Because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding
arbitration, without any negotiated public sector labor settlements
guiding the arbitrators. Str4ikes should be outlawed only for
categories of public-sector workers for whose serices no acceptable
substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

A.Where
public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations
with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

B.Where
strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no
acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those
workers are available.

C.Binding arbitration tends to be more
advantageous for public-sector workers where it is the only available
means of settlinglabor disputes with such workers.

D.Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.

E.A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from and arbitrator.

The answer is C. Why? 只给了两个单词的解释, 觉得这道题异常莫名其妙,疯了。

沙发
发表于 2009-6-8 11:28:00 | 只看该作者

33 同问,请NN帮忙呀

板凳
发表于 2009-6-9 01:27:00 | 只看该作者
  low-paying service人数 100 到 200   total employment 1000 到 2000     share of total employment 10% 没变 working in high-paying人数10 增加的40  share of total employment可能以前0.1% 现在是0.2%
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-11 22:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部