ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1279|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1--71

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-14 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

prep1--71

in many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. however, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need goverment assistamce to suvive , and the same corporation that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

which one most strengthens the author's argument

A many workers who have already lose their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs

B many corporation that have fail to automate have seen their profit decline.

C taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating

D most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did

E the initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short--term saving in labor costs

the answer is A. would you tell me the reason? thank you!!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-14 22:50:43编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-4-15 01:44:00 | 只看该作者
For company, the reasoning is given below:

Lay off more workers --> Pay more taxes and unemployment insurance payments

Hence, how to strengthen the reasoning? once more layed-off workes can not seek the new job yet, then the previous company will pay longer for these unemployed worker until they got the new one.

The asnwer is the most likely one in matching our reasoning above.

Hope helps

Alex
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部