[求助]一道反对题

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actons on a ceratin fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous -action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A)the compliance date was subject to postponement ,according to the terms of the treaty.

(B)one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required

(C)each country might have a well-founded excuse,based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance.

(D)the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action.

(E)there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actionscontemplated in the treaty are to be complete.

答案选C，为啥？这个是怎么推理的？

这道题目我开始也没想明白。但是不知道这样想是不是对。

题目说了一大通，然后问题来了个有什么可能让这个TREATYLEAVE OPEN,就是C这个如果国家有可能说不遵从的理由，那么这个7过的TREATY就无法执行，但是这个理由EXCUSE，是各国来说定的，那么就LEAVE OPEN了。最终的结果就无法达成了。

思维过程是

TREATY限制七国同时执行一些行动--》因为加了我们要选的项--》所以这个TREATY有问题，无法执行。

楼上，  leave open 不是 OPEN TREATY  而是 LEAVE OPEN POSSIBILITY , 断句有问题，

C 选项说， 每个国家都找到了不合作的借口，  有这种可能，为什么呢，  因为 每个国家的行动以集体的行动为基础， 而某个国家行动后会通知另外的国家，  那么，谁第一个行动呢？  没有人！  因为他们都会说其他人没有动， 

这样说不知轻不清楚

楼上拜托你看清楚,我说的LEAVE OPEN不是你说的那个意思..不知道为何今天都吃火药了..我说的LEAVE OPEN POSSIBILITY,是遗留可以反驳的空间

我思维的时候一起打的,可能有打字错误之处.....咳...这样也要被人说...拜托看完我整个回答..莫名其妙..

似乎你的推理完全照抄我...我觉得你去读商学院没有点协作和宽容别人小错误的能力,建议你不用读了..团队的项目,你似乎根本就无能力完成...

谢谢你给我回帖，让我明白了很多。在这里大家不都是讨论吗，何必说得火药味这么浓呢，大家都和气一点嘛，学习要有激情，也不至于要互相指责吧，你说对不？

再次谢谢你