ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1164|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道逻辑题请NN详解

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-9 23:04:00 | 只看该作者

一道逻辑题请NN详解


    

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a
petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being
circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a
petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law
banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that
are open to the public.


    

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as
circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the
local ordinances statewide?


    

 


    

A.      Health costs associated
with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect
nonsmokers.


    

B.       In rural areas of the
state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices
that are open to the public.


    

C.      The state law would
supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than
the state law does.


    

D.      There is considerable
sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.


    

E.       The state law would not
affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire
authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

求NN详解。应该选B还是C?(似乎都有道理)


沙发
发表于 2009-4-9 23:26:00 | 只看该作者
我选B。
文中提到 all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances,如果要做到Statewide Smoking Restriction的话就是要对部分的towns开刀。可是如果如B所说,这些地方本来就没有几家卖烟的地方,就是对voters的一种误导,因为这种advocacy意义不大了。
板凳
发表于 2009-4-10 11:54:00 | 只看该作者

B

C中提到的比较是无关项

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 05:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部