ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1032|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山 9-Q7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-5 04:12:00 | 只看该作者

天山 9-Q7

In American Genesis, which covers the century of technological innovation in the United States beginning in 1876, Line Thomas Hughes assigns special promi- (5) nence to Thomas Edison as archetype of the independent nineteenth-century 25 inventor. However, Hughes virtually ignores Edison’s famous contemporary and notorious adversary in (10) the field of electric light and power, George Westinghouse. This comparative neglect of Westinghouse is consistent with other recent historians’ works, although it marks an intriguing (15) departure from the prevailing view during the inventors’ lifetimes (and for decades afterward) of Edison and Westinghouse as the two “pioneer innovators” of the electrical industry. (20) My recent reevaluation of Westinghouse, facilitated by materials found in railroad archives, suggests that while Westinghouse and Edison shared important traits as inventors, they (25) differed markedly in their approach to the business aspects of innovation. For Edison as an inventor, novelty was always paramount: the overriding goal of the business of innovation was (30) simply to generate funding for new inventions. Edison therefore undertook just enough sales, product development, and manufacturing to accomplish this. Westinghouse, however, shared the (35) attitudes of the railroads and other industries for whom he developed innovations: product development, standardization, system, and order were top priorities. Westinghouse (40) thus better exemplifies the systematic approach to technological development that would become a hallmark of modern corporate research and development.

Q7: The author of the passage implies that the shift away from the views of Westinghouse’s contemporaries should be regarded as A. a natural outgrowth of the recent revival of interest in Edison B. a result of scholarship based on previously unknown documents C. reflective of modern neglect of the views of previous generations D. inevitable, given the changing trends in historical interpretations E. surprising, given the stature that Westinghouse once had


答案是E,我选C
我的看法:W所在年代对他的评价:“发明红旗手”,正评价吧 
题目问:对于偏离当代评价,作者怎么认为的?答案很清楚地写在文章里,尽管这种偏离是intriguing的,但是“This comparative neglect of Westinghouse is consistent with other recent historians’ works”。很明显是C啊。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-5 4:12:50编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-1 23:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部