- UID
- 453212
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Although the Women’s Industrial Defence Committee (WIDC), formed (15) in 1892 in response to earlier legislative attempts to restrict women’s labor, did not dis- count the white lead trade’s potential health dangers, it (20) opposed the proposal, view- ing it as yet another instance of limiting women’s work opportunities. Also opposing the proposal was the Society (25) for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW), which attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of ill- ness in white lead factories. (30) SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the devel- opment of lead poisoning. (35) SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace (40) safety regulations were stringently enforced. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 30-34 (“SPEW contended … lead poisoning”) ? A. Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees. B. The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories. C. There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century. D. White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations. E. Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers. 这其实是阅读中的逻辑题。answer is A. What's wrong with E? 谢谢大家指点。 |
|