ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1793|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充材料154

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-19 00:57:00 | 只看该作者

补充材料154

8. A new law gives ownership of patentsdocuments providing exclusive right to make and sell an inventionto universities, not the government, when those patents result from government-sponsored university research. Administrators at ffice:smarttags" />laceName>LogoslaceName> laceType>UniversitylaceType> plan to sell any patents they acquire to corporations in order to fund programs to improve undergraduate     teaching.
     Which of the following, if true, would cast most doubt on the viability of the college inistrators’ plan described above?
     (A) Profit-making corporations interested in developing products based on patents held by universities are likely to try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects.
     (B) Corporate sponsors of research in university facilities are entitled to tax credits under new
    federal tax-code guidelines.
     (C) Research scientists at laceName>LogoslaceName> laceType>UniversitylaceType>
have few or no teaching responsibilities and participate little if at all in the undergraduate programs in their field.
     (D) Government-sponsored research conducted at laceName>LogoslaceName> University
for the most part duplicates research already completed by several profit making corporations.
     (E) Logos University
is unlikely to attract corporate sponsorship of its scientific research.
A为什么不可以作为答案呢?






[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-19 0:57:21编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-2-19 13:02:00 | 只看该作者
答案下次也给贴出来吧


答案是d


至于a中说的Profit-making 不会想买,那还可以有nonProfit-making可以买的嘛, 除了corporations不买,还可以有个人来买的嘛


所以只要能把专利卖出去,那college inistrators’ plan 就是没有问题的,而原文是要削弱,那只能说那个专利根本就卖不出去才是最有效的啊

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-19 20:11:00 | 只看该作者
说的是呀!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-15 04:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部