ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1960|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急!!!请教一个逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-29 14:58:00 | 只看该作者

急!!!请教一个逻辑题

21. When limitations were in effect on nuclear-arms testing, people tended to save more of their money, but when nuclear-arms testing increased, people tended to spend more of their money. The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe, therefore, decreases the willingness of people to postpone consumption for the sake of saving money.

 

The argument above assumes that

A. the perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe has increased over the years.

B. most people supported the development of nuclear arms

C. people’s perception of the threat of nuclear catastrophe depends on the amount of nuclear-arms testing being done

D. the people who saved the most money when nuclear-arms testing was limited were the ones who supported such limitations

E. there are more consumer goods available when nuclear-arms testing increases

这题的答案为什么是C不是A啊?题干中的When limitations were in effect on nuclear-arms testing, people tended to save more of their money, but when nuclear-arms testing increased, people tended to spend more of their money.不就是C的意思吗?为什么说C是假设啊,我觉得A更好一点,因为结论中的 The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe没提到是增加核试验还是减少核试验,而结论是人们扩大了消费,所以我觉得答案应该是A

不知道我这样理解是不是有偏差,请各位赐教!谢谢大家!

沙发
发表于 2009-1-29 16:50:00 | 只看该作者
nuclear-arms testing与perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe之间是不同的,即核实验未必等同于核灾难,前提必须是把2者联系起来,才能使结论成立。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-30 12:27:00 | 只看该作者

明白了,谢谢哈!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-11 21:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部