ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1071|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-24 15:24:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
64. People cannot be morally responsible for things over which they have no control. Therefore, they should not be held morally responsible for any inevitable consequences of such things, either. Determining whether adults have any control over the treatment they are receiving can be difficult. Hence in some cases it can be difficult to know whether adults bear any moral responsibility for the way they are treated. Everyone, however sometimes acts in ways that are an inevitable consequence of treatment received as an infant, and infants clearly cannot control, and so are not morally responsible for, the treatment they receive.
D. If a given action is within a certain person's control that person should be held morally responsible for the consequences of that action.
这题不选D,我就是想问D为什么错了?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-7-25 07:47:18 | 只看该作者
First sentence: if no control, then no responsibility. It's contrapositive should be if responsible, then control.

D said that if control, then responsible, it is reversed, so it is wrong.

This is a LSAT logical reasoning question, trick but fun
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-25 11:04:38 | 只看该作者
thanks!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 12:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部