ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9957|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-12-37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-6 22:12:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-12-37

Many economists believe that a


       high rate of business savings in the


       United States is a necessary precursor


Line to investment, because business sav-


  (5)      ings, as opposed to personal savings,


comprise almost three-quarters of the


national savings rate, and the national


savings rate heavily influences the


overall rate of business investment.


(10)      These economists further postulate


that real interest rates—the difference


between the rates charged by lenders


and the inflation rates—will be low when


national savings exceed business


(15)       investment (creating a savings surplus),


and high when national savings fall


below the level of business investment


(creating a savings deficit ). However,


during the 1960’s real interest rates


(20)      were often higher when the national


       savings surplus was large.  Counter-


       intuitive behavior also occurred when


real interest rates skyrocketed from


2 percent in 1980 to 7 percent in 1982,


(25)      even though national savings and


investments were roughly equal


throughout the period.  Clearly, real


interest rates respond to influences


other than the savings/investment


(30)      nexus.  Indeed, real interest rates may


themselves influence swings in the


savings and investment rates.  As real


       interest rates shot up after 1979, for-


eign investors poured capital into the


(35)     United States, the price of domestic


goods increased prohibitively abroad,


and the price of foreign-made goods


became lower in the United States.  As


      a result, domestic economic activity


(40)     and the ability of businesses to save


and invest were restrained.


GWD-12-Q37:


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding the economists mentioned in line 1?


              



  • Their beliefs are contradicted by certain economic phenomena that occurred in the United States during the 1960’s and the 1980’s.


  • Their theory fails to predict under what circumstances the prices of foreign and domestic goods are likely to increase.


  • They incorrectly identify the factors other than savings and investment rates that affect real interest rates.


  • Their belief is valid only for the United States economy and not necessarily for other national economies.


  • They overestimate the impact of the real interest rate on the national savings and investment rates.

  • 答案是a,偶选c;


    文中黑体字,个人认为是对c的同义解释。


    请教a、c如何排除?

    沙发
    发表于 2005-1-9 01:27:00 | 只看该作者

    C错,因为,这些经济学家仅仅说储蓄-投资关系将影响实际利率,但他们并没有说出其他的因素会影响实际利率。

    所以,A对,因为和文意一致。

    板凳
    发表于 2005-5-8 16:49:00 | 只看该作者

    对文章的大意不太明白,很怵这类文章

    有哪位好心人能帮我归纳一下文章呢

    地板
    发表于 2005-5-9 13:40:00 | 只看该作者

    GWD-12-Q35 to GWD-12-Q37:

    Many economists believe that a high rate of business savings in the United States is a necessary precursor Line                to investment, because business sav(5) ings, as opposed to personal savings, comprise almost three-quarters of the national savings rate, and the national savings rate heavily influences the overall rate of business investment.

    很多经济学家相信美国高利率的商业储蓄是投资业的必要先决条件,因为和个人储蓄相反,商业存储组成了将近3/4的国有储蓄,而国有储蓄极大的影响了商业投资的整体回报率。

    (10) These economists further postulate that real interest rates—the difference between the rates charged by lenders and the inflation rates—will be low when national savings exceed business        (15)                         investment (creating a savings surplus), and high when national savings fall below the level of business investment (creating a savings deficit ). 这些经济学家进一步假定当国有储蓄超过商业投资的时候(产生了储蓄盈余),实际的利率借贷者所付的利率和通货膨胀率之间的差值将会较低;而当国有储蓄低于商业投资总额的时候(产生了储蓄赤字),实际的利息率将会较高。

    However, during the 1960’s real interest rates        (20)         were often higher when the national savings surplus was large.        Counter-intuitive behavior also occurred when real interest rates skyrocketed from 2 percent in 1980 to 7 percent in 1982, (25)                even though national savings and investments were roughly equal throughout the period.        

    但是,在60年代,当国有储蓄盈余较大的时候,实际的利息率往往很高。当实际利率从1980年的2%一路飙升到1982年的7%的时候,违反直觉的行为也发生了,尽管当时的国有储蓄和投资大致相当。

    Clearly, real interest rates respond to influences other than the savings/investment (30)                nexus.

    很显然,实际的利率和储蓄/投资比率之外的因素相关。

    Indeed, real interest rates may themselves influence swings in the savings and investment rates.        As real         interest rates shot up after 1979, foreign investors poured capital into the        (35)                         United States, the price of domestic goods increased prohibitively abroad, and the price of foreign-made goods became lower in the United States.

    事实上,利率本身可能会影响储蓄和投资之间的比率。当利率从1979年飙升以后,国外的投资者注入大量资本到美国,美国生产的产品价格在海外不可思议的高,而国外制造产品的价格在美国开始降低。

            As a result, domestic economic activity (40)                and the ability of businesses to save and invest were restrained.

    结果,国内经济活动和存储及投资的能力受到限制。

    不是学经济的,有些词的翻译可能有些问题,但是文章的脉络还是很清晰的。这篇文章是质疑某些经济学家的看法。

    counterintuitive:Contrary to what common sense would suggest

    prohibitive

    adjective

    If the cost of something is prohibitive, it is too expensive for most people:

    - Hotel prices in the major cities are high but not prohibitive.

    prohibitively

    adverb

    - Property in the area tends to be prohibitively expensive (= so expensive that you can not buy it).



    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-9 13:47:02编辑过]
    5#
    发表于 2005-5-13 18:02:00 | 只看该作者
    支持楼上版主MM
    6#
    发表于 2005-7-8 06:55:00 | 只看该作者
    36题呢.我还是没懂啊
    7#
    发表于 2005-8-12 17:56:00 | 只看该作者

    而今翻译的真好!

    8#
    发表于 2005-8-12 22:31:00 | 只看该作者

    36题呢.我还是没懂啊


    您贴个题目吧?^_^

    9#
    发表于 2005-9-5 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

    37题为什么不能选E呢??


    看到作用而没有看到反作用可以说是overestimate吗??

    10#
    发表于 2005-9-5 18:26:00 | 只看该作者

    Clearly, real


    interest rates respond to influences


    other than the savings/investment


    (30)         nexus.


    respond to反应,也就是说,利率是一些因素(储蓄,投资....什么的)的反映,不能影响,当然不能 impact,也就无所谓overestimate或者underestimate了

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 13:59
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部