|
86. (24488-!-item-!-188;#058&000922) Juniorbiomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotionsdepend significantly on the amount of their published work. People responsible for making hiring andpromotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influencedmuch more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications haveon his or her field than by the number of those publications. Theinformation above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of thefollowing claims? A.Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expectedalready to have published articles of major significance to the field. B.Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered tobe significant only if the work is published. C. The potential scientificimportance of not-yet-published work is sometimes taken into account indecisions regarding the hiring or promotion of biomedical researchers. D.People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers canreasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of acandidate's publications on his or her field. E. Biomedicalresearchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion byfragmenting their research findings so that they are published in severaljournals instead of one. OA E.我选的C。
搜到了之前的讨论帖，但是好像我的疑问不太一样。。。
死都不明白题目是啥意思，题目主干部分给了两句话，一个观点是 新研究人员，他们认为数量重要， 另一个观点是 决定他们晋升的人， 他们认为质量重要。 这不是两个观点嘛？ 为啥问哪项反驳了原文观点。原文有两个观点啊，反驳谁啊？ 吧答案带进去想一想，原文自己吧第一个观点就否定了？？？ 原文的观点=第二个观点=质量重要？ 貌似这样才能解释清楚啊。。。不知道有没有人有相同的困惑 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-8-1 17:33:34
收藏
收藏
楼主
