ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2740|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT1-IV-22问题请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-19 01:34:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT1-IV-22问题请教

22. It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.

Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?

(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.

(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.

(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.

(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.

(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate
答案是A。。看不懂原文,请教。

谢谢。
沙发
发表于 2003-6-19 02:43:00 | 只看该作者
In A, the second effect is "volunteers at the children’s hospital". The particualr effect and pbserved effect is "gave a thousand dollars to our historical society". The error described in the passage is that it is wrong to conclude that another different effect is derived from the same cause of an observed effect, which is the only effect of that cause.

In A, it is wrong to conclude that volunteer is the effect of the same cause that make the person donate money. It should be from another cause. Here the cause is not specified.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-19 02:55:00 | 只看该作者
oh...I see...thank you, mindfree.
I mistakenly thought that there is some logic errors in the argument of passage...The passage just describe an error, there is no logic error throughout the passage...

thank you..
地板
发表于 2003-6-19 03:00:00 | 只看该作者
thanks a lot , mindfree.

I got it.
5#
发表于 2004-4-24 21:59:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks!!!Mindfree!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-5 23:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部