GWD逻辑题找关系

Xiaotongdi · 发表于 2011-4-10 23:05:32

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer.Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’
s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers

the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s

the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

找关系？D

lonelyorchid · 发表于 2011-4-11 17:19:55

是D无疑。
文章逻辑，P是L的作者合一结论并不可信，因为人们只依据一个16世纪早期的文献做出的判断。一些16世纪晚期的作品也说P是L的作者，但是这一结论也不可信，因为：
D说，那些16世纪晚期的文献是依照早期的文献所编写的。（也就是说没有事实上引入新的证据）

GWD逻辑题找关系

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()