ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1028|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

另一道老太婆题,麻烦,快考了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-14 20:24:00 | 只看该作者

另一道老太婆题,麻烦,快考了


    

A
recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on
Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three
percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped
with them.  Clearly, drivers who equip
their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit
regularly than are drivers who do not.


    

 


    

The
conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?


    

 


    

(A)
Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be
ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.


    

(B)
Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to
exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.


    

(C)
The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was
greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.


    

(D)
Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were
ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.


    (E) Drivers on Maryland
highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state
highways not covered in the report.
实在是不知道这道题的point在哪儿?
沙发
发表于 2008-10-15 20:32:00 | 只看该作者
a吧,有radar的人,没radar的人,超速,两个对象一件事情,问假设,原文意思是有了radar容易超速,那就找一个not+weaken,就是一个选项的反说来削弱原文,a反说后是有radar比没雷达的更可能被抓,从而削弱了radar引起的超速,not+weaken构成必要条件,即假设。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-16 16:11:00 | 只看该作者
unfortunately,答案是B。我貌似见过好几个版本的答案,但确实是从来没理顺过。不过谢谢回答,思路很精辟
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-4 07:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部