og 54(讨论会总理没有呀~~~)

54.

It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.

Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?

(A) It is true that it is against the police department’s policy to negotiate with kidnappers. But if the police want to prevent loss of life, they must negotiate in some cases.

(B) it is true that it is illegal to refuse to register for military service. But there is a long tradition in the United States of conscientious objection to serving in the armed forces.

(C) It is true that it is illegal for a government official to participate in a transaction in which there is an apparent conflict of interest. But if the facts are examined carefully, it will clearly be seen that there was no actual conflict of interest in the defendant’s case.

54.

The argument in the passage acknowledges that a certain action contravenes a law, but it presents an excuse for the action by presupposing that someone will inevitably break this law. Only choice D shares all these features, and is thus the best answer.

In Choice A, an excuse is presented for contravening a stated policy. However, unlike in the passage and choice D, there is no presupposition that the policy will inevitably be contravened. Similarly, choices B and E report that illegal activities have occurred, without presupposing that they inevitably will. Choice C describes a case as being one to which the law that is stated is inapplicable

刚刚开始复习，不知道分析的对错，前人也没有讨论过这道题目，试着分析一下

文中的逻辑结构是

首先a做的事情违法，b其次你不违法，别人将来也会来违法

A 符合a非法了，但是警察违法了，别人将来也会来违法（题中没有出现别人）

b 符合非法，但是违法意识有很长的历史，没有讲未来是否还有这种意识

c 符合违法，但后面讲的在什么情况下不会违法

d 偷盗违法，如果被告不去盗窃，将来也会有人去盗窃。（关键词 first someone else)

e 符合坡坏政策，只讲现在有很多解雇，没有将来的情况。

是不是文中逻辑结构的事态也非常重要，结论中有will将来时态，选项就要有阿？

请nn指教！！