- UID
- 5468
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-10
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Making the Cut at Kellogg
Admissions Director Beth Flye explains the process, including the interview and essays, and says, "the competition is high"
B-school applications are down this fall, but that might not make it any easier for MBA hopefuls to get into their top-choice school, at least at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, ranked No. 1 in BusinessWeek's latest rankings. Here, Admissions Director Beth Flye says it depends on the quality -- not quantity -- of applications they receive each year. Kellogg gave the nod to only 16% of the school's 5,000 applicants in 2003, and the competition to get in remains tough.
Flye fielded admissions questions from a live audience during a Jan. 7 BusinessWeek Online chat hosted by reporter Mica Schneider. She was joined by Eric Jagher, a current second year at Kellogg who also works in the MBA admissions office. Here's an edited transcript of that event:
Q: All of us are eager to know about the quantity and quality of the applicant pool this year. Any insights? Flye: I'm happy to report that the quality of the pool is exceptional. In terms for the volume, we're in line with industry trends right now. We've seen a decline in numbers, but again, the good news is that the quality is outstanding. And it's still early in terms of where we are in the cycle.
Q: By what percentage have applications dipped? Flye: Compared to the past couple of years, we've seen a decline in the range of 20% to 30%, which is in line with our peer schools. The majority of applications have yet to come into the pipeline, but right now we're a bit more in line with where we were prior to the spike in applications in 2001 and 2002.
[Editor's note: Kellogg received 5,802 applications for its full-time MBA program in 2000.]
Q: It's not difficult to infer that fewer applications mean a less selective admissions process this year. Isn't it safe to say that if you're a current MBA applicant, you've got a better chance in 2004 of getting a nod than in previous years? Flye: Though the volume may be down, the competition is still going to be high. I would say two things: not necessarily, and it depends on the mix of the applicant pool. And again, we're still waiting for the majority of the applications to come in.
Q: Eric, maybe you can shed some light on the application process. Do you envy the people applying to B-school in 2004? Do they have a better chance of getting into their top schools? Jagher: I remember the process well, having gone through it just over two years ago. I don't envy the people applying in 2004, as I remember how long the process can take. I wouldn't say this year's applicants have a better chance, since the applications we've seen have been very solid.
Q: This audience member asks, "How is Dean Jain changing the school? I've heard that there may be less focus on teamwork and more on leadership." Jagher: I would disagree with that sentiment. I think Dean [Dipak] Jain continues to encourage teamwork in everything that we do at Kellogg. Dean Jain, much to the joy of all students, has also made a significant effort to reach out to Kellogg alumni, so that they may assist us in the job search process.
Q: Would you throw some light on what happens to the file the moment it gets into the admission office -- what piece of data you read first and how you try to get to know the applicant? Flye: First of all, the application file has to be assembled. Once all of the application information that we require is in, then the file is assembled and it goes into the reader pool. The first read is conducted by one of the members of our student admissions committee. There will be a second read with one of the admissions officers. Then the file comes to me, and in some cases the file may have an additional reader, since we want to be very thorough.
Q: Which pieces of the MBA application carry the most weight? Flye: We have a very holistic approach, because every applicant is unique. We don't assign any particular weight or value to any item or criteria for admission.
Q: Kellogg is among the first schools that required each admitted candidate to do an interview. Why does Kellogg view the interview as just another piece of data, rather than giving it more weight? Flye: Of course the interview is important, just as every criteria that we evaluate is important. The interview is valuable to us in assessing presence, interpersonal skills, and communication skills, as well as making an in-person assessment about each applicant's fit with our program.
Q: What questions can an applicant expect to hear during an alumni interview? What exactly is Kellogg looking to learn in its admissions interviews? Flye: We don't have a set list of questions. Whether the interview is conducted by one of our students, one of our admissions officers, or an alumni interviewer, the goal is to have a sense of the candidate in terms of fit, interpersonal skills, maturity, and so forth. Of course we're also trying to get a better handle on the person's leadership experience and professional experience.
Q: Does it help a person's chances of acceptance to visit the school and interview with the admissions committee on campus, instead of doing an alumni interview? Flye: Interviews count the same whether they're with one of our alumni, with a student interviewer, or with one of us on the admissions team. I would strongly encourage people to visit Kellogg. The advantage of interviewing [on campus] is that people have a chance to experience our culture firsthand via visiting classes and meeting current students.
Jagher: I would definitely encourage anyone interested in Kellogg to visit the school, sit in on a class, and maybe most important, take a walk around Evanston. It is a phenomenal place to live. |
|