[求助]鼓起勇气 丢人现眼的请教大家一个问题

复习的效果一直不太好

虽然大家都说不用背单词 可是很多时候我觉得我做错的题目 是因为不认识单词 没明白意思

所以我想确认一下我的程度 是不是我的单词还需要再提高一些 如果不是单词 也许我需要思考别的方面

提前感谢回答我帖子的TX

拿昨天做的一个通篇皆错的阅读来举例吧

题目中所有红色的单词 都是我不认识的 想听听大家意见 对于一篇阅读 有这么多的不认识单词可以接受么

In a new book about the antiparty[d1]  feeling of the early political leaders of the United States, Ralph Ketcham argues that the first six Presidents differed decisively[d2]  from later Presidents because the first six held values inherited from the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England. In this view, government was designed not to satisfy the private desires of the people but to make them better citizens; this tradition stressed the disinterested[d3]  devotion of political leaders to the public good.  Justice, wisdom, and courage were more important qualities in a leader than the ability to organize voters and win elections.  Indeed, leaders were supposed to be called to office rather than to run for office.  And if they took up the burdens of public office with a sense of duty, leaders also believed that such offices were naturally their due because of their social preeminence[d4]  or their contributions to the country.  Given this classical conception of leadership, it is not surprising that the first six Presidents condemned political parties.  Parties were partial by definition, self-interested, and therefore serving something other than the transcendent[d5]  public good.

Even during the first presidency (Washington's), however, the classical conception of virtuous[d6]  leadership was being undermined by commercial forces that had been gathering since at least the beginning of the eighteenth century.  Commerce--its profit-making, its self-interestedness, its individualism--became the enemy of these classical ideals.  Although Ketcham does not picture the struggle in quite this way,he does rightly see Jackson's tenure[d7]  (the seventh presidency) as the culmination[d8]  of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism.  For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship[d9]  lost its relevance[d10] , and under the direction of Van Buren, party gained a new legitimacy.  The classical ideals of the first six Presidents became identified with a privileged[d11]  aristocracy[d12] , an aristocracy that had to be overcome in order to allow competition between opposing political interests.  Ketcham is so strongly committed[d13]  to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline.  For example, the classical conception of leadership was
incompatible[d14]  with our modern notion[d15]  of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately[d16]  associated with the legitimacy[d17]  of opposing political parties.

给MM鼓气

你标出来的我也好多都不认识。。。 

但是我想的是 现在不认识的 记下来 以后就认识了 

阅读遇到不认识的单词，（我觉得）很正常。 大多数情况下也不会影响理解。

主要是怕语法逻辑遇到。 如果mm是全职复习， 可以花一到两天总结做过的语法，逻辑题里面不认识的单词。 然后强化记忆。  如果是兼职复习， 可能时间比较紧， 但如果能挤时间总结不认识的单词， 相信会让mm至少能心安。

如果确实在考场上遇到了由于不认识的单词而不能做的题， 那就试一试能不能从上下文猜测大概意思。 就算不能也不要影响做题心情和步调。 保持好的心态最重要！

good luck!

我不是怕打击

就是想确认一下问题在哪里

逻辑也经常因为单词理解错误于是。。。

看来单词量确实不过关？

阅读受单词影响相对小很多，关键是要找到文章TS KW，把握文章结构和作者态度。

这样，主题题、态度题基本就可以拿下。

至于细节题，就是回文定位，找到题干的kw，然后定位在文章首次出现处，细节题的正确答案无非是原文的同意改写或者是取非。

但是对于CR，单词的影响就要大许多了，因为逻辑题就那么几句话，必须能够弄明白细节，而不是仅仅把握结构。

还有7天考试，如果是全职复习，建议背GMAT词频，单词相对较少，3天应该能有提高。

第一段，R.K.写了一本关于美国早期领导人antiparty的书，在书中，R.K.认为前6位总统和之后的不一样。前6位-public good，之后的organize voters and win elections。并由此引出classical conception of leadership-a sense of duty。基于以上，前6位总统是antiparty的，因为party是serving something other than public good。

第二段，however ，从第一任总统开始，classical conception of leadership就受到了commerce的挑战。R.K.看到在第七任总统时，对party,commerce的接受程度达到顶峰。R.K.过于committed来证明classical ideals是正确的，以至于他忽视了decline of classical ideals的好处，例如。。。。

文章读到这个程度，完全可以做题了，LZ可以把题目贴出来看看，起码主题题、态度题是完全可以做的。

至于细节题，就是回文定位的工作了。

谢谢秋风的认真 很感动

R.K.看到在第七任总统时，对party,commerce的接受程度达到顶峰 这句当时就没读出来

查了单词才明白