ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1393|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解GWD一逻辑题~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-11 12:16:00 | 只看该作者

求解GWD一逻辑题~

Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?

A.    In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.

B.    Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.

我选的第一个,答案是第二个。如果矿主停止采矿了,虽然征收的费少了,可开矿的人也少了呀,average并不见得就减少~第一个跟第二个的结果不是一样的吗?都是采煤的少了?

请教NN们~


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 12:16:08编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-9-11 23:17:00 | 只看该作者

我同问。。。我根本不理解这段话的意思。。。完全没有思路的

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-12 00:23:00 | 只看该作者
牛人留下脚步啊~~~!!!
地板
发表于 2008-9-13 01:23:00 | 只看该作者

A不对是因为 reclamation fee is charged per ton, 和总采矿量没有关系.

B中隐含的意思是这个条例刚刚出台的时候他们在mountainous areas开采, reclamation 的费用会高一些,现在那个区域关闭了, 费用自然也就下来了.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-13 16:31:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢哇~~~为什么看了别人的解释就觉得理所当然,自己却做不出来呢....线路问题...
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-13 16:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dustyrick在2008-9-13 1:23:00的发言:

A不对是因为 reclamation fee is charged per ton, 和总采矿量没有关系.

B中隐含的意思是这个条例刚刚出台的时候他们在mountainous areas开采, reclamation 的费用会高一些,现在那个区域关闭了, 费用自然也就下来了.

谢谢谢谢~~~~~~果然是“自然”就下来了...自己就是“自然”不出来哇>_<
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 10:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部