[求助]LSAT-6-2-22

22. The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.

Which one of the following points out why the trustees' plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?

(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program

(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment

(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program

(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships

(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants

参考答案是D, 欧选B, 欧觉得D 不一定削若，因为 local applicants 和 non-local applicants 的人数/drama水平可能相差很大；极端假设有1000个local applicants, 100个non-local applicants, 这100个non-local appliants的individual drama level, 都可以进入top 50 of 1000 local applicants.... 这样D 就不足为奇了。。。。

yeah, 其实不看选项也能猜出这种分local and non-local测评的弊端，并不能保证从两组人里分别选出来的10%优秀的是总人数中最优秀的10%。

欧有点走火入魔了。。。。

thx anyway, my lawyer.

For my understanding, if there are some local (or nonlocal) applicants who are not offered scholarships having higher audition than those nonlocal (or local) applicants who are offered scholarships, then it's not proper to be said by the stimulus that "they are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program"