偏题怪题害人，建议不要做狒狒逻辑

我没有考过试，准备也就一个月，算是个菜鸟。但是，今天做36道狒狒题目，给我的感觉是，质量太让人摇头了，对于gmat考试毫无助益。

比如下面这道题，是第二组的第一题。Jane的逻辑主线是：“电视电影的暴力镜头，导致青少年暴力。所以针对青少年节目中的暴力描写，应该被禁止。”

上述观点被Maurice反驳，他认为青少年暴力由来已久，早在电影电视之前就产生了。

问对于Jane有利的支撑是什么？

答案是B，我也确实做对了，想必是自己水平太差，花了四分多钟才摸到头绪。按照gmac的出题思路，不外乎青少年暴力的时间对比（几个世纪前和现在比较，或者是看与不看暴力电影的青少年之间比较）。而这道题目简直是晕到家，唉。

其他这样的题目有很多，明明应该着手的逻辑线索避而不谈，专找小地方，让人把所有的答案看一遍还不知所以然，又要重头找。

我想自己批评这么有名的狒狒逻辑，实在是不自量力。只是希望时间有限的备考者，少浪费时间在无用物上面。提一点个人意见，仅供参考。

19.  Jane: Television programs and movies that depict violence among teenagers are extremely popular. Given how influential these media are, we have good reason to believe that these depictions cause young people to engage in violent behavior. Hence, depictions of violence among teenagers should be prohibited from movies and television programs, if only in those programs and movies promoted to young audiences.

Maurice: But you are recommending nothing short of censorship! Besides which, your claim that television and movie depictions of violence cause violence is mistaken: violence among young people predates movies and television by centuries.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens Jane’s argument?

(A) The most violent characters depicted in movies and on television programs are adult characters who are portrayed by adult actors.

(B) The movies that have been shown to have the most influence on young people’s behavior are those that are promoted to young audiences.

(C) The people who make the most profits in the movie and television industry are those who can successfully promote their work to both young and old audiences.

(D) Many adolescents who engage in violent behavior had already displayed such behavior before they were exposed violence in movies.

(E) Among the producers who make both movies and television programs, many voluntarily restrict the subject matter of films directed toward young audiences.