ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1712|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

各位帮帮忙~学文的脑袋看不出这个逻辑啊

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-23 12:05:00 | 只看该作者

各位帮帮忙~学文的脑袋看不出这个逻辑啊

 
In response to years of increasing congestion at airport X, the government decided to redistribute landing slots.  Henceforth, all international flights arriving from continent A would be rerouted to nearby airport Y, all flights arriving from continent B would continue to land at airport X.  Several airlines opposed this measure on the grounds that it would result in lost business.
Which of the following, if true, justifies the airline’s conclusion?
(A)
                
The airlines’ customers prefer less congested airports.
(B)
                
It takes five minutes more flying time to reach the second
airport.
(C)
                
There are fewer runways, and thus less capacity, at airport Y.
(D)
                
Airport Y is located in a region with better transport links to the
final destinations of many travelers from continent B.
(E)
                
Many customers traveling between continent A and continent
B choose certain airlines because of the easy flight
connections they offer at airport X.
沙发
发表于 2008-8-23 12:11:00 | 只看该作者
答案是什么,我选E
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-23 12:28:00 | 只看该作者
自己先顶下~ 答案说选E 你们觉得有道理没?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-23 12:29:00 | 只看该作者

为什么啊~ 能不能帮忙分析下啊

5#
发表于 2008-8-23 13:06:00 | 只看该作者
Several airlines opposed this measure on the grounds that it would result in lost business. 这句话是结论啊,强加他就只要说确实回造成生意的损失就可以了,E就是这个意思,他们来X机场转机的,现在去Y机场了,谁还坐这个飞机
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-23 13:29:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢啦~ 有点头绪了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 17:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部