ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3541|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-B-2(第二次求救啊!help!)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-8 01:36:00 | 只看该作者

大全-B-2(第二次求救啊!help!)

2.     In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:


(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

为什么答案是A?谢谢大家


沙发
发表于 2004-8-8 03:45:00 | 只看该作者
it is better to separate them. one question for one post
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-9 00:12:00 | 只看该作者
偶已经改了格式啦,不要不理我啊
地板
发表于 2004-8-11 12:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用云在青天水在瓶在2004-8-8 1:36:00的发言:

2.     In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:


(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

为什么答案是A?谢谢大家




     My thoughts about the question are:   


     Impose strict air-pollution regulations on local industry --> bird species increase


     Therefore, no matter how serious the air-pollution caused by local industry, impose the law can increase the bird species. Instead, other cities should have the same air-pollution situation like London, as choice C states. So choice A is an unnecessary assumption.


It's my 2 cents, any imputs are welcome!!

5#
发表于 2004-8-11 23:35:00 | 只看该作者
对A取非:in most major cities, air-pollution problems are not caused almost entirely by local industry.
不是entirely, 但可以是partly。即使仅是partly caused by local industry, 采取排污限制措施仍然会对其它城市有利。所以对A取非不能得出相反结论,A不是原结论的assumption.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-12 00:09:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢大家的帮忙,偶又看了一遍提,关键是吧assumption,support给混了;还有就是The increased sightings of bird species ——这局看走眼了。

many thanks to you all!

7#
发表于 2006-7-10 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用AdamCheng在2004-8-11 12:05:00的发言:

     My thoughts about the question are:  

     Impose strict air-pollution regulations on local industry --> bird species increase

     Therefore, no matter how serious the air-pollution caused by local industry, impose the law can increase the bird species. Instead, other cities should have the same air-pollution situation like London, as choice C states. So choice A is an unnecessary assumption.

It's my 2 cents, any imputs are welcome!!

Agree with your concise yet effective thoughs...

8#
发表于 2008-8-20 11:28:00 | 只看该作者
`up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 15:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部