ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1275|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

FF Test7, 111答案如何理解?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-10 18:22:00 | 只看该作者

FF Test7, 111答案如何理解?

111. The stated goal of the government’s funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

 

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton’s argument is based?

 

A.        Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

B.        Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.

C.        Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.

D.       Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.

E.    A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.

答案E,开始我也选E,后来发觉用非=Weaken的原则来看,D不是更好?只要有真艺术,就不接受政府资助。取非,仍然接受资助->政府资助可以有真艺术

大家看看是否合理啊?

沙发
发表于 2008-8-11 00:21:00 | 只看该作者

楼主是想说 D 取非削弱, 因此是assumpt? 这个说法也是有道理的, 但是问题是, 楼主取非做的不正确

D说: 真艺术->不接受基金, 取非为: 真艺术 不一定 不接受基金, 这是取非, 而楼主是把前件取非, 后件也取非, 然后颠倒, 这和原来的表述是完全一个意思,

如: A->B, 取非为A不一定推出B, 而 非B->非A 在逻辑上 可以理解为 A->B, 一模一样, 这个是充分条件的重要结论, 呵呵

而D取非后, 也无法削弱结论, 具体楼主再想一下, 如果想不清楚...我再解释, 今天头晕...呵呵

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 20:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部