楼上正解。以下附imply和infer的区别 imply Function:transitive verb Etymology:Middle English emplien, from Anglo-French emplier to entangle — more at EMPLOY Date:14th century 1 obsolete : ENFOLD, ENTWINE 2 : to involve or indicate by inference, association, or necessary consequence rather than by direct statement <rights imply obligations> 3 : to contain potentially 4 : to express indirectly <his silence implied consent> infer Function:verb Etymology:Middle French or Latin; Middle French inferer, from Latin inferre, literally, to carry or bring into, from in- + ferre to carry — more at BEAR Date:1528 transitive verb 1 : to derive as a conclusion from facts or premises <we see smoke and infer fire — L. A. White> — compare IMPLY 2 : GUESS, SURMISE <your letterTallows me to infer that you are as well as ever — O. W. Holmes !1935> 3 a : to involve as a normal outcome of thought b : to point out : INDICATE <this doth infer the zeal I had to see him — Shakespeare> <another survey...infers that two-thirds of all present computer installations are not paying for themselves — H. R. Chellman> 4 : SUGGEST, HINT <are you inferring I'm incompetent?> intransitive verb : to draw inferences <men...have observed, inferred, and reasoned...to all kinds of results — John Dewey>
usage Sir Thomas More is the first writer known to have used both infer and imply in their approved senses (1528). He is also the first to have used infer in a sense close in meaning to imply (1533). Both of these uses of infer coexisted without comment until some time around the end of World War I. Since then, senses 3 and 4 of infer have been frequently condemned as an undesirable blurring of a useful distinction. The actual blurring has been done by the commentators. Sense 3, descended from More's use of 1533, does not occur with a personal subject. When objections arose, they were to a use with a personal subject (now sense 4). Since dictionaries did not recognize this use specifically, the objectors assumed that sense 3 was the one they found illogical, even though it had been in respectable use for four centuries. The actual usage condemned was a spoken one never used in logical discourse. At present sense 4 is found in print chiefly in letters to the editor and other informal prose, not in serious intellectual writing. The controversy over sense 4 has apparently reduced the frequency of use of sense 3.
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-3 0:49:28编辑过] |