ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1030|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd2一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-27 18:32:00 | 只看该作者

gwd2一道逻辑题

求解一道逻辑题gwd的

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.
Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.
However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  • Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
                
  • Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
                
  • The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
                
  • Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
                
  • The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
   为何选c 题干中不是以明确说了原因为参加过课程的比没有犯罪更少,而c选项说参加过课程的没比没参加的少
我选a 觉得a表明了 取消参加课程资格没有对减少犯罪起作用
沙发
发表于 2008-7-27 19:09:00 | 只看该作者

文中的结论是: 课程有用, 减少犯罪. A --B

A. 不上课并不能减少犯罪. ---这个不是原文假设, 没有FILL GAP. not A ---not B, 我觉得是支持, 不是假设.

C: 选择上课的人(在上课之前)并没有比不上课的人更不(在被放出去以后)容易犯罪. 换句话说, 这些人的觉悟是一样的, 并没有不同. ---是一个起支持作用的假设.

我做的时候, 也在这上面绕了很久..

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 02:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部