ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1329|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-11 请帮我下,谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-6 03:03:00 | 只看该作者

OG-11 请帮我下,谢谢

86.    Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators

        Which of the following, if true, most seriously   undermines the journalist's argument?

     A. Every article based on experiments with particle accelerators that was submitted for publication last year actually was published.

     B. The average time scientists must wait for access to a particle accelerator has declined over the last several years. 

      C. The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.

     D. Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.

     E. Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle‑accelerator research will be accepted for publication.

 请帮我解释下这道题目的解释思路好吗。。我很困惑这道题, 答案是E

沙发
发表于 2008-7-6 05:36:00 | 只看该作者
i choose D. cause i think accelerator is the core of the argument, not all those accelerators were out service, so the ones left can still help researchers to write articles.
板凳
发表于 2008-7-6 05:49:00 | 只看该作者
I checked the og answers, however, i found the explaination on "D" is conflict with the questions, on the contrary, the more articles can right undermine the argument.
welcome to discuss this question.
地板
发表于 2008-7-6 16:10:00 | 只看该作者

E说报道少了是因为采编思路变了,属于指出他因吧?

就好像国内报社、网站、电视台天天会接到XCB通知,说某些敏感事件不要"炒作",所以报纸上不会出现相关文章。

5#
发表于 2008-7-6 18:55:00 | 只看该作者
E,给出他因,B和D都说明了文章应该很增多,但文章应当增多并没有削弱原文推论,B和D是一个道理,当时我做的时候就在想B和D,后来我就是这样想通的,文章是要求削弱这样一个推论:离子加速器少了——》相关实验的文章少了,文章本身应该是多了还是不变是无关的。而且此题可以看的很清,前提是无法削弱的,肯定只能是削弱推论过程和结论,所以B和D是无法去削弱的,E就是告诉你另外个原因使文章少了。LZ可以略作参考
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部