ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1528|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og11-99中答案解释中的一句话不理解 请达人点解下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-26 22:50:00 | 只看该作者

og11-99中答案解释中的一句话不理解 请达人点解下

题目:An experiment was done in which human subjects recognize a pattern within a matrix of abstract designs and then select another design that completes that pattern. Th results of the experiment were surprising. The lowest expenditure of energy in neurons in the brain was found in those subjects who performed most successfully n the experiments.

Which of the following hypotheses best accounts for the findings fo the experiment?

答案C. People who are better at abstract pattern recognition have more energy-efficient neural connections.

Reasoning:In order to account for the findings,the hypothesis must suggest a plausible link between successful performance and the energy expenditure of neurons in the brain.Where is there areasonably direct relationship between the given factors and the conclusion that is drawn?Understand that hypotheses based on factors not included in the experiment cannot be used to account for the findings

最后这一句怎么看都没明白

麻烦大家给我指点下吧 鞠躬~~~~~~~~~~~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-27 00:18:00 | 只看该作者
等~~~~~~~~~~~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-27 13:47:00 | 只看该作者

继续期待 指点

地板
发表于 2008-6-28 20:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用浅斟低唱在2008-6-26 22:50:00的发言:

题目:An experiment was done in which human subjects recognize a pattern within a matrix of abstract designs and then select another design that completes that pattern. Th results of the experiment were surprising. The lowest expenditure of energy in neurons in the brain was found in those subjects who performed most successfully n the experiments.

Which of the following hypotheses best accounts for the findings fo the experiment?

答案C. People who are better at abstract pattern recognition have more energy-efficient neural connections.

Reasoning:In order to account for the findings,the hypothesis must suggest a plausible link between successful performance and the energy expenditure of neurons in the brain.Where is there areasonably direct relationship between the given factors and the conclusion that is drawn?Understand that hypotheses based on factors not included in the experiment cannot be used to account for the findings

最后这一句怎么看都没明白

麻烦大家给我指点下吧 鞠躬~~~~~~~~~~~

尝试理解一下:

要明白那些建立在实验中没有包含的因素的假设是不可以用于说明(实验)发现的。

5#
发表于 2008-6-28 23:14:00 | 只看该作者

顶alice的翻译

我觉得这句是定从套定从,看起来有点绕

Understand that hypotheses( based on factors ((not included in the experiment)) cannot be used to account for the findings
            

划线部分是understand的宾语,  ((not included in the experiment)) 修饰factors, ( based on factors ((not included in the experiment)) 修饰hypotheses

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-29 14:32:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢楼上两位好心的mm

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部