ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2595|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TT-2-17 为啥选E?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-18 22:29:00 | 只看该作者

TT-2-17 为啥选E?

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides.  New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt.  Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

我选的是C(文中已经提到了尽量减少potassium chloride 的副产品的量,那和哪个具体法规限制又有什么关系?),但原来WORD文档中的答案是E,我觉得E和D没有什么大的区别(都是关于potassium chloride和common salt 在保护动物皮革质量和效率方面的比较)。到底答案应该是什么?请NN们指点,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2008-6-19 21:31:00 | 只看该作者

非NN

E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

不过我觉得E是属于无关选项,文中根本就没有提the chemical properties是不是能使potassium chloride 或common salt一样有效。

板凳
发表于 2008-6-20 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

E是无关的。

C是有关的。你尝试回答一下C,如果是yes。结果如何呢?只要结果对该企业的决策产生了影响,都是有关项。

我限制你生产副产品,结果你的环境危害就比较大,结果你就不太可能替代盐,这是有逻辑关系的啊。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-20 13:09:00 | 只看该作者
好像有点明白了,谢谢两位前辈!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 23:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部