ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2536|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Help?Lsat Section3-I-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-4 10:51:00 | 只看该作者

Help?Lsat Section3-I-10

10. Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of bean plants or other legumes produce fixed nitrogen which is one of the essential plant nutrients and which for non-legume crops, such as wheat normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer. So if biotechnology succeeds in producing wheat strains
whose roots will play host to Rhizobium bacteria. The need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.
The argument above makes which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Biotechnology should be directed toward producing plants that do not require
artificial fertilizer.
(B) Fixed nitrogen is currently the only soil nutrient that must be supplied by
artificial fertilizer for growing wheat crops.
(C) There are no naturally occurring strains of wheat or other grasses that have
Rhizobium bacteria living in their roots.
(D) Legumes are currently the only crops that produce their own supply of fixed
nitrogen.
(E) Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would produce fixed nitrogen.
answer:E my choice:B
why not be right for B?
沙发
发表于 2003-9-5 07:26:00 | 只看该作者
If NOT B, the conclusion will not be weakened, because the conclusion of the passage is that if biotechnology succeeds in producing wheat strains whose roots will play host to Rhizobium bacteria,the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced, so the focus is nitrogen-based fertilizer, there is no any relationship with other soil nutrients.
板凳
发表于 2008-6-11 16:02:00 | 只看该作者

还是不明白,为什么 B取非不能削弱啊?搜索了一下该题,发现没有其他的帖子讨论这题,难道是我钻牛角尖?大家都明白的样子~~可是我就是很困惑为啥B不对?

我觉得原文是说会减少,如果对e取非,即Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would not produce fixed nitrogen,比如制造varied nitrogen,也可以减少人工化肥啊,只是量的区别而已。

求助

地板
发表于 2008-6-11 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用amywangwei在2008-6-11 16:02:00的发言:

还是不明白,为什么 B取非不能削弱啊?搜索了一下该题,发现没有其他的帖子讨论这题,难道是我钻牛角尖?大家都明白的样子~~可是我就是很困惑为啥B不对?

我觉得原文是说会减少,如果对e取非,即Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would not produce fixed nitrogen,比如制造varied nitrogen,也可以减少人工化肥啊,只是量的区别而已。--MM把原题的条件都改了阿,已经说了这些原来没有固氮菌的作物 such as wheat normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer

求助

同时,对B取非,(B) Fixed nitrogen is NOT currently the only soil nutrient that must be supplied by
artificial fertilizer for growing wheat crops. 还有其他营养也需要人工化肥来供给,那么化肥的用量还是有可能减少(有了固氮菌,氮可以少用),丝毫不影响原题的结论

5#
发表于 2008-6-12 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢ivyqxx!是我阅读能力不行,没把原文理解清楚。

which for non-legume crops, such as wheat normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer 这个which是指fixed nitrogen,而非nitrogen,E肯定没问题了。

B取非,有可能用化肥量还是减少的,所以不能说削弱结论。

之前在LSAT版看很多人讨论三段论,我觉得这里用三段论比取非削弱更好找出正确答案。premise 1: R细菌能造固氮,固氮是植物必须的营养;premise 2: 小麦依赖施氮肥来获得固氮;结论:小麦根提供host给R细菌,就能减少人工化肥量。

bridge:小麦根上的r细菌能造固氮。这样一看,觉得固氮是不是唯一药施肥的就不那么相关了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 08:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部