ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1222|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]LR 95-02

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-11 06:54:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LR 95-02

95/2

Monroe, despite his general poor appetite, thoroughly enjoyed the three meals he ate at the Tip-Top restaurant, but unfortunately after each meal he became ill. The first time he ate an extra-large sausage pizza with a side order of hot peppers; the second time he took full advantage of the all-you-can-eat fried shrimp and hot pepper special; and the third time he had two of Tip-Top’s giant meatball sandwiches with hot peppers. Since the only food all three meals had in common was the hot peppers. Monroe concludes that it is solely due to Tip-Top’s hot peppers that he became ill.

要求找inference. 答案是B.

B) if at his third meal at Tip-Top, Monroe had chosen to eat the baked chicken with hot peppers, he would have become ill after that meal

C) if the next time Monroe eats one of Tip-Top’s extra-large sausage pizzas he does not have a side order of hot peppers, he will not become ill after his meal

如果理解成conditional reasoning的话,即if hot pepper, then ill. 那么答案毫无疑问是B

但是如果理解成causal reasoning的话,hot pepper导致ill, 没有hot pepper就没有illness, 这样C也对。

最后一句conclusion到底是causal还是conditional reasoning呢?due to很明显是causal的指示词啊!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-17 4:34:18编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-15 12:25:00 | 只看该作者
怎么没人理啊?大家帮我看看啊。为什么着里的conclusion: it is solely due to Tip-Top’s hot peppers that he became ill.不是causal reasoning呢。due to 是很明显的causal reasoning的指示词啊??如果是causal的话,B答案应该也是正确的啊。
板凳
发表于 2008-6-15 23:38:00 | 只看该作者
Actually the answer is B, you should confirm which is the right anwer first. 
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 17:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部