ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1058|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Sb helps to interpret this, please!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-12 20:08:00 | 只看该作者

Sb helps to interpret this, please!!

I'm so confused by the following sentenses in red. Can sb help to interpret what does it mean?? THX!!!!

Many United States companies have, unfortunately,

made the search for legal protection from import

competition into a major line of work. Since 1980 the

United States International Trade Commission (ITC)

(5) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage

from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign

governments. Another 340 charge that foreign compa-

nies “dumped” their products in the United States at

“less than fair value.” Even when no unfair practices

(10) are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been

injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief.

Contrary to the general impression, this quest for

import relief has hurt more companies than it has

helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they

(15) develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and

research relationships, The complexity of these relation-

ships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief

laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under

the same parent company.

(20) Internationalization increases the danger that foreign

companies will use import relief laws against the very

companies the laws were designed to protect. Suppose a

United States-owned company establishes an overseas

plant to manufacture a product while its competitor

(25) makes the same product in the United States. If the

competitor can prove injury from the imports---and

that the United States company received a subsidy from

a foreign government to build its plant abroad—the

United States company’s products will be uncompeti-

(30) tive in the United States, since they would be subject to

duties.

Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC

investigated allegations that Canadian companies were

injuring the United States salt industry by dumping

(35) rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the

complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United

States operations was crying for help against a United

States company with foreign operations. The “United

States” company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a

(40) Dutch conglomerate, while the “Canadian” companies

included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the

second-largest domestic producer of rock salt.

沙发
发表于 2008-8-14 01:59:00 | 只看该作者

就是举个例子对全球一体化经济的影响做阐述,例如一家跟美国公司竞争的外国公司在美国开公司,而这家美国公司在外国开公司,外国公司如果能证明因美国公司接受外国政府的建厂补贴而使得自己(美国建厂的外国公司)在行业中受到进口产品带来的损失的话,那么该家美国公司在美国销售的商品将面临重税,这样这家美国公司就在美国市场上失去了竞争力。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-5 02:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部