还没开窍的菜鸟求助

A violin constructed to have improved sound would sound different from the best-sounding existing violins. To professional violinists, a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins. Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins.

Would be best supported by those statements?

(A) Only amateur violinists should be asked to judge the sound quality of newly constructed violins.

(B) Professional violinists supervise the construction of violins.

(C) The best-sounding existing violins have been in existence for several centuries.

(D) It is currently impossible to construct a violin that the only accepted judges will evaluate as having improved sound.

(E) It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professions violinists.

答案是选D。

我选的是E。认为对于everyone ，那些have improved sound 的小提琴听起来会better than best-sounding existing violins，但对于professions violinists来说却觉得是less like a violin ，所以不会觉得better than。

请大家指点～～

我很确认的选D，呵呵，又要遭人打了，三层意思

1 一个V提高了声音肯定与最好的V不同。重点：不同

2 对于职业PV，他们认为那个发出不同的V声音肯定没有哪个最好的V好。

3 这个是结论，重点的重点，所以推断出，职业VST是仅仅能判断V质量的唯一共证人。这里用了ONLY很绝对哦，那答案必然也蛮绝对的！

这里停顿下来想想，那要证明这最后一句话，那自然要证明，无论好V还是那个改过的V，这个VST都能鉴定出，才可能支持这个唯一性对吧。也就是答案项必须提到这个人吧，PV!

A 有ONLY看看很像，但是业余的V这里题目根本没有延伸到这层，而且说仅仅业余的有资格看，削弱项

B PV负责制造V-制造就能推出有判断能力吗？无关

C 最好的V存在几个世纪的，但是还是可能在某年某月里被人比掉的，跟这个PV不是联系很大。

D 

不好意思啦，我的输入系统老出问题，

D 目前还没有可能造这样一个V被证明是提高了。从另一个面证明了目前PV对改过的V和最好的V的判断是正确的。那既然论据都是对的，肯定论点是正确的，这个答案项提到了，JUDGE，关键很重要。联系一下。

E最后一项削弱，都可以造出这样的V了，那为何PV还要鉴定那个BV是最好的？一矛盾，二削弱，所以不存在是答案的可能性！