请教各位 大牛 大侠求解cxd假设题一道

some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtined evidence in criminal trials if the juged and jury can be persuaded that the arresting officer was not aware of violating or did  not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence. this proposed "good-faith exception"would weaken everyone's constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.

the argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that

d the prohibition now deters some unlawful seaches and seizures

e courts should condiser the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial

为什么是d 我到觉得prohibition 也没提过呀 e错的原因

帮帮忙吧

some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtined evidence in criminal trials 

d the prohibition now deters some unlawful seaches and seizures

assumption中的A可行,有意义呗 对么??

我当初没看总结做题时用的是排除法 谁能说下e的错误么

帮帮忙哦

真的还没全明白呀