ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2431|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东归纳9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-14 13:43:00 | 只看该作者

陈向东归纳9

9 Consider three fish swimming together in a school. The space within which each fish can be seen by predator Y is defined by a sphere centered on the fish and having a radius that is the maximum distance Y can see. The school is vulnerable to attack when Y is within one of the three spheres. The spheres overlap to a great extent, since the fish are in a compact group.


Which of the following is a reliable inference to be drawn from the passage above?


(A)         The vulnerability to attack of the school as a whole is not much greater than the vulnerability to attack of any one fish in the school.


(B)         There is less chance that predator Y will attack a school of four fish than that it will attack a school of three fish.


(C)         Fish who swim I schools are less likely to be devoured by predators than are fish who do not swim in schools.


(D)     The maximum distance at which an individual fish is visible depends less on the size of the fish than on whether the fish is swimming in a school.


(E)         The maximum distance at which predator Y can see its prey is increased if Y is itself swimming in a school of Y’s.


答案:A


虽然BCDE很明显不能从文中推出,但是A又是怎样依据前提和结论推出的。

沙发
发表于 2004-3-14 18:47:00 | 只看该作者
这题有点绕。The school is vulnerable to attack when Y is within one of the three spheres. The spheres overlap to a great extent, since the fish are in a compact group.


如果Y进入三个球形范围中的任何一个,整体都会受攻击。


而三个球体大部分重合。换句话就是整体和单个的球体范围几乎相同,比如99%重合,整体就是单个的102%。所以整体会稍大一些,但不是很多。


所以A,整体受攻击的机会不比单个的大多少。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-12 11:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部